A Spectre, A Spectre - Haunting, A Spectre Haunting Europe, AA-EVP, Aaron Mahnke, Acoustic Anthropology, Acoustic Rorschach, Adolf Hitler, Aetheism, AHRC, AHRC Research Fellow, AHRC Research Fellowship, Ale Hop, Aleksander Kolkowski, Alexandra Kokoli, Allenheads, Allenheads Contemporary Arts, Alternative Facts, Always Alive Recordings, Amateur Radio, American Association of Electronic Voice Phenomena, Amy Winehouse, Amy Winehouse Ghost, An Adventure In Apophenia, Anòmia, Anders Monrad, Ann Winsper, Anne-James Chaton, Anomalous Psychology Research Unit, Answer the Call, Apophenia, Apophenia Audio, Apophenia Cloud Travel Apparatus, Apophenia Delay, Apophenia Delay Pedal, Apophenia Guitar Pedal, Apophenia Luxmorph, Apophenia Press, Apophenia Research, Applied Cognitive Psychology, APRU, Archive 81, Archive81, Archives From Konstantin Raudive, Art and Culture, Artefact, Artificial Language, Artist As Medium, Arts & Humanities Research Council, Association Transcommunication, ATransC, Audible Inkblot, Audible Rorschach, Audible Rorschach Test, Audint, Audio Apophenia, Audio Ghost, Audio Illusion, Audio Inkblot, Audio Intelligence, Audio Paredolia, Audio Pareidolia, Audio Phantom, Audio Phantoms, Audio Rorschach, Auditory Ambiguity, Auditory Apophenia, Auditory Ghost, Auditory Hallucinations, Auditory Illusion, Auditory Illusions, Auditory Inkblot, Auditory Knowledge, Auditory Knowledge and the Arts, Auditory Phantasm, Auditory Phantasmic Presence, Auditory Phantom, Auditory Projection, Auditory Projective Test, Auditory Rorschach, Auditory Summator, Aura Satz, Aural Diversity, Aural History, B.F. Skinner, Babble Machine, Background Noise, Barbara Ellison, Barry Ghai, BBC Radio, BBC Radio 4, BBC Wales, Belus, Ben Burbridge, Bereavement, Bertrand Russell, BF Skinner, Bill Hartley, Bill Murray, Black Tapes, Black Tapes Podcast, Blanc Sceol, Bompass & Parr, BPS, Breakthrough, Brian Dillon, British Psychological Society, British Tinnitus Association, BTA, Buh Records, Cadavre Magnétique, Calla, CB Radio, Celebrity Ghost Box, Channel One Channel Two and Channel Three, Charlie Gere, Charlie McDowell, Charlotte Law, Charlotte Phillips, Chelsea College of Arts, China Mieville, Chris French, Citizen Scientists, Claire Elliott, CM von Hausswolff, Cognitive Science, Communications, Confounded by Apophenia, Conjuring, Contextual Priming, Copus, Courtauld Institute, CTM Discourse, Cultural and Critical Theory, Cultural Theory, Damien Simon, Damion Searls, Dan Aykroyd, Dan Smith, Daniel Powell, Dave Tompkins, David Marcusson-Clavertz, David Toop, David Wesley Sutton, Day of the Dead, Dead Files, Dead Lines, Dead Signals, Dead Signals Podcast, Delicious Audio, Denman Horn, Diana Deutsch, Diana Pasulka, Digital Dowsing, Digital Ethereal, Discovery, Disembodied Voice, Disinformation, Disinformation Art, Disinformation Art Project, Disinformation Artist, Disinformation Artist Project, Disinformation Artist's Project, DJ Spooky, Dragan Spasov, Drawing Phantoms, Drawing Room, Duke University, Dyslex, Eccentronic Research Council, Eggsy, Electromagnetism, Electronic Voice Phenomena, Elizabeth Saint, Enfield Haunting, Enfield Poltergeist, Entity Sensory Pro, Ephemera, Ephemera Festival, Ephemery, Ephemery Festiwalu, Erik Deerly, Erminio Alekos Serpente, Ernie Hudson, Etzel Cardeña, EVP, Ex Anima, Exponential Horn, FACT, FACT Liverpool, Falsifiability, Farmer, Faster Circuits, Félicia Atkinson, Felicia Barr, Festiwalu, Finders Keepers Records, Florian Hecker, Folkestone Biennial, Fortean Times, Foundation for Art and Creative Technology, Francisco Lopez, Friedrich Jürgenson, Gerhard Stempnik, Ghost, Ghost Adventures, Ghost Asylum, Ghost Audio, Ghost Box, Ghost Brothers, Ghost Hunting, Ghost in the Machine, Ghost Lab, Ghost Machine, Ghost Orchid, Ghost Radar, Ghost Sonar Detector, Ghost Speaker, Ghost Stories, Ghost Voice Research, Ghostbusters, Ghostbusters 2, Ghosts, Ghosts and Demons, Ghosts In The Machine, Ghosts Monsters and Legends, Glenn Branca, Goldie Lookin Chain, Goldsmiths College, Gregory Whitehead, Ham Radio, Hannah White, Harold Ramis, Haunted House, Haunted Machine, Haunted Machines, Haunted Media, Haunted Technology, Haunting, Haunting Europe, Hauntology, Hayward Gallery, Hayward Gallery Touring, Hayward Lars Bang Larsen, Head of Zeus, Hearing, Hearing Voices in the Noise, Help! My House is Haunted, Hermann Rorschach, High Static, High Static Dead Lines, Holographic Skies, How To Wreck A Nice Beach, Huib Emmer, Humanism, Hypothesis Formation, Ian Thompson, Illusion in Language, Illusion in Speech, Illusion in Speech and Language, Illusions & Paradoxes, IMCC, Impakt Festival, Inaudible Becomes Audible, Infra-Specter, Infrasound, Inspiral London, Institute for Modern and Contemporary Culture, Investigation, Irene Noy, J. Milo Taylor, James Alcock, Jamie Hamilton, Jeffrey Sconce, Jennifer Walshe, Jo Burzynska, Joe Banks, John E. Buckner, John Palmer, John Rutledge, Jonathan Calver, Journal of Scientific Exploration, Julie Wolfe, Justin Lader, Justin Sausman, Justine Picardie, Karl Popper, Ken Hollings, Koladé Spirit, Konstantin Raudive, Kristen Gallerneaux, Lafayette College, Language Game[s], Larry Sider, Last Tuesday Society, Laurie Taylor, Lawrence Abu Hamdan, Le Bon Accueil, Lee Ranaldo, Leeds 2023, Leeds2023, Left of the Dial, Left of the Dial Podcast, Leif Elggren, Leigh Wilson, Listening to Yourself, Loco-Lab, Lore, Lore Podcast, Lucas Grandin, Luke Jerram, Lumisokea, LXV, Machine, Machine and the Ghost, Magic Lantern, Manchester University, Manchester University Press, Marc Sollinger, Marco Pasi, Marie, Marie Thompson, Marina Warner, Mark Fisher, Mark Leary, Mark Pilington, Mark Pilkington, Mark Underwood, Martyna Poznanska, Matt Collier, McFarland & Co, Meaning in Randomness, Mercy, Merge Festival, Michael A. Nees, Michael Esposito, Mike Kelley, Mirage Men, Mishearing, MIT Press, Mnemotechnics, Mounir Fatmi, Mr. Bill, Musical Ear, Musical Ear Syndrome, Musical Illusions, Musical Illusions & Paradoxes, Musical Illusions & Phantom Words, My Ghosts, Nathan Jones, National Taiwan Museum of Fine Arts, Natural Phantoms, Nautil.us, Nautilus, Near Future Laboratory, Neil Matheson, Netflix, Neuroscience, Nicholson Heal, Nick Groff, NMC Recordings, No Such Thing As Gravity, No Such Things As Gravity, Not Without My Ghosts, Not Without My Ghosts: The Artist As Medium, NTMoFA, Occam’s Razor, Ockham’s Razor, Ovada, Oxford Brookes, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford Brookes University - Sonic Art Research Unit, Paranormal Activity, Paranormal Culture, Paranormal Cultures, Paranormal Research, Paranormal State, Parapsychology, Parapsychology: A Handbook for the 21st Century, Paredolia, Pareidolia, Pareidolia and Apophenia, Pareidolia Research, Patrick, Patrick Farmer, Patrik Lechner, Paul Bae, Penguin, Penguin Random House, Penned in the Margins, Perception, Pete Bebergal, Peter Bebergal, Phantasma Humana, Phantasmatic Audio, Phantasmatic Sound, Phantasmic Presence, Phantom Audio, Phantom Portraits, Phantom Sounds, Phantom Terrains, Phantom Within, Phantom Words, Philip Jaeckl, Philosophy of Science, Phonetic Generator, Phonographies, Pierre Bastien, Politics of Listening, Postmodernism, Printed Matter, Printed Matter Chelsea, Projection, Pseudoscience, Psychoacoustics, Psychological Society, Psychology, Psychophony, Public Understanding Of Science, Quest for the Supernatural, Radio 4 Extra, Radio Interference, Radio Noise, Radiophrenia 87.9FM, Random House, Raudive Surrogate, Rebecca A. Buckner, Recording Angels, Recording Technology, Resonance FM, Retromania, Richard Helix, Rick Moranis, Rob la Frenais, Robert Redford, Robin Rimbaud, Roger Luckhurst, Rorschach Audio, Rorschach Device, Rorschach Devices, Rorschach Sound, Royal College of Art, Royal Conservatory, Ruede Hagelstein, Sarah Estep, Sarah Sparkes, SARU, Sas Mays, Scanner, School of Sound, Science Gallery, Science Museum, Scientific Methodology, Scrambled Messages, Shane Butler, Sian Eleri, Sigmund Freud, Sigourney Weaver, Simon & Schuster, Simon Grant, Simon Reynolds, Site Gallery, Site Sessions, Smalltalk for Lonely Ghosts, Society for Psychical Research, Somerset House, Sonic Art, Sonic Art Research Unit, Sonic Field, Sonic Histories, Sonic History, Sonic Inkblot, Sonic Phantoms, Sonic Rorschach, Sonic Rorschach Test, Sonic Rubbish, Sonic Spectre, Sonic Spectres, Sonic Studies, Sonic Youth, Sonology, Sonology Education, Sophie Mallett, Sophie Scott, Soul in the Machine, Sound Salon, Sound Studies, Southbank, Southbank Centre, Spambot EVP Poetics, Speak Spirit Speak, Spectral Communication, Spectral Paradigms, Spectre, Spectre Haunting, Spectre Haunting Europe, Speech and Language, Speech Science, Spirit Box, Spirit Voices, SPR, Sprit Box, Static Man, Stefan Goldmann, Stephen Shiell, Steve Goodman, Steve Rajam, Steven Rajam, Strange Attractor, Strange Attractor Journal, Strange Attractor Press, Strange Frequencies, Strange Telemetry, Stray Voices, STUK, Supernatural Magazine, Susan Hiller, Suzanne Treister, Syfy Channel, Talking to the Dead, Tate Modern, Tautophone, Team EVP, Team IF, Teapot, Technological Quest, Technological Quest for the Supernatural, Technology and Spiritualism, Technology and Spiritualism in Nineteenth to Twenty-First-Century Art and Culture, Telegraphic Imaginary, Telephony, Terry Miles, The Act of Magic, The Artist As Medium, The Auricle, The Black Tapes, The Black Tapes Podcast, The Conjuring, The Conjuring 2, The Discovery, The Enfield Haunting, The Extraordinary Story of the Technological Quest for the Supernatural, The Ghost, The Ghost Formula, The Ghost in the Machine, The Girl, The Gravestone, The Hague, The Hum, The Inkblots, The Machine and the Ghost, The MIT Press, The Phantom Within, The Psychologist, The Skeptic, The Soul in the Machine, The Static Man, The Unexplainers, The Voice of God, The Voices Of The Dead: Archives From Konstantin Raudive And Gerhard Stempnik, There Are No Dead, There Is No Death, They Might Be Giants, Thibaut de Ruyter, This is a Voice, Thomas B.W. Bailey, Thomas Bey, Thomas Bey William Bailey, Thomas Y. Levin, Thompson, Tilman Küntzel, Tinnitus, Tom Butler, Tony Oursler, Trickster, University of Huddersfield, University of London, University of the Arts, University of Westminster, University Press, Unsoundu, Unsoundu Festiwal, Venetian Veil, Vic Tandy, VLF Radio, Vocal Phantoms, Voice Of The Dead, Voices from Beyond, Voices of the Dead, Walkie-Talkie, Walking With Ghosts, We Haunt You While You Watch, Wellcome Trust, Wet Sounds, Wetsounds, White Noise, Why We Hear Voices in Random Noise, William Bailey, Without My Ghosts, ]Sub Rosa
Audio Pareidolia, Ghost Research & EVP
Amy Winehouse celebrity ghost box session!
“Parapsychology: A Handbook for the 21st Century”, edited by Etzel Cardeña, John Palmer & David Marcusson-Clavertz, published by McFarland, 2015, features a chapter entitled “Electronic Voice Phenomena” by Mark Leary and Tom Butler, which I came across because (as with the last publication reviewed on this website) this also cites the version of “Rorschach Audio” that was published in 2001 [1]. The publisher’s website describes McFarland as “a leading independent publisher of academic and non-fiction books”, states that the phenomena discussed in “Parapsychology: A Handbook” have been researched “by eminent scientists, including Nobel laureates”, and describes the book as providing “a comprehensive scientific overview of research in the field of parapsychology” [2]. The editors of this book boast impressive academic credentials, and, at a whopping 400-plus pages, it’s a substantial work, which contains detailed and scholarly discussions of research methods and of methodology that are relevant to this field. As regards the chapter on EVP, author Mark Leary is a Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience at Duke University [3], and writes for the same Association Transcommunication [4] that’s mentioned in the previous article on this website, while Tom Butler turns out to be the co-director of the Association Transcommunication, and to be co-author of the book “There is No Death and there are No Dead” [5].
Now, it’s important to describe the basic subject matter for any readers who may be visiting this website for the first time, however, because I’ve done so previously, several times, I’ll reiterate even more briefly than usual that the basic idea of EVP research is the belief that it’s possible, using various radio and electrical engineering techniques, to literally record the voices of ghosts, and that, primarily on account of the use of electronic technology, this form of ghost hunting is often described by supporters as being a form of scientific research. A rational explanation for EVP recordings would be that these voices do exist, but that they result from misheard “stray” radio communications, not ghosts, with listeners projecting meaning onto distorted and poor quality audio recordings, in the same way that viewers “see” meanings in semi-random shapes such as the famous Rorschach ink-blot tests. The images seen when imaginary meanings are projected onto Rorschach ink-blot tests, onto rock formations, coffee stains, damp walls and passing clouds etc, are often referred to as pareidolia, hence, in context of EVP etc, the terms “Rorschach Audio” and “audio pareidolia” are effectively synonymous.
As I said, the chapter in “Parapsychology: A Handbook” quotes an early “Rorschach Audio” research paper, and, while the chapter discusses a great deal of other material, it would be fair to say that to an extent the whole chapter seems to be a response to “Rorschach Audio”, since the entire discourse is dedicated to arguing why the authors believe that some EVP can’t be explained as resulting from psychoacoustic pareidolia, and why therefore (in their opinion) some EVP might be genuinely supernatural.
In responding to the argument that some listeners perceive EVP as being ghosts etc as a result of simple mishearings, “Parapsychology: A Handbook” states that “some writers have extended the pareidolia hypothesis by suggesting that listeners project themselves (in the Freudian sense) into random noise so that their interpretations are often tailored to their own personality and needs (hence the term “Rorschach Audio”)”. They go on to state that “Banks (2001)” has “offered an interesting analysis of this possibility… which we agree is certainly possible”. In fact I would say that this psychoanalytic aspect is particularly relevant in the case of the most famous EVP researcher, Konstantin Raudive, who stated for example on page 88 of his book “Breakthrough” that (quote) “utterances by Hitler or about him could fill a separate book” (emphases added).
From a personal point-of-view it’s gratifying to see that “Rorschach Audio” has been read by and seems to have influenced some parapsychologists, and that it’s been transmitted by this Handbook to a larger audience. However the Handbook claims that “Rorschach Audio” focussed on “particularly egregious examples of poor recording methods and analysis that are not characteristic of serious EVP investigators”. In fact the version of “Rorschach Audio” that the Handbook quotes clearly states that it addresses the “major, salient issues that recur throughout EVP research and that… underpin the entire belief system” (emphases added). In addition, far from focussing on examples that are “not characteristic of serious EVP investigators”, the same “Rorschach Audio” paper examines the methods employed by Konstantin Raudive, which, “egregious” as they may have been, were nonetheless the work of the most famous EVP researcher. To be fair, the Handbook does acknowledge that Raudive’s work was “uncontrolled” and “often fanciful”, but when the Handbook then claims that “the study of EVP after Raudive has [since] been conducted primarily by citizen scientists”, there’s no attempt to show whether such studies are really scientific.
With regard to such methods, after acknowledging that one of Raudive’s favourite EVP recordings turned out to have been conclusively debunked as an ordinary German radio broadcast, the Handbook goes on to argue against the suggestion that EVP voices might arise as a result of (quote) “radio interference”, because “EVP do not include snippets of songs, commercials, news broadcasts, weather forecasts and announcer patter” and “do not resemble radio broadcasts of any kind”. It seems obvious however that radio broadcasts aren’t radio interference (as these terms are understood here). The case of Raudive’s favourite sequence notwithstanding, the fact that most EVP recordings don’t consist of sounds that we typically associate with conventional broadcasts (they’re not “news… weather… announcer patter” etc) can’t disprove the hypothesis that interference (cross-modulated “stray” signals from taxis, emergency services vehicles and passing aircraft etc) produces EVP. The authors seem to have mixed-up their own terminology; and the reason that “EVP do not include snippets of songs” is presumably because, if and when the EVP researchers do pick-up conventional broadcasts, they recognise them for being what they are, don’t categorise them as potential EVP, and don’t save them up for subsequent examination… they just ignore them.
As for the physical origins of EVP, the version of the “Rorschach Audio” paper that “Parapsychology: A Handbook” cites, suggests that potential sources of stray voices include “taxi transmissions, emergency services, air-band, maritime, military, short, medium and long-wave commercial broadcasts, TV voice channels, ham radio experiments, CB radio, bugging devices, conferencing systems, intercoms, baby intercoms/alarms and analog mobile phones” etc. Commercial broadcasts and TV voice channels notwithstanding, it is particularly interesting that, in terms of active listening, this chapter’s authors had the acuity to notice that “some EVP are immediately preceded by a click or a signal break-in as if the transmitter button on a two-way radio has been keyed”. If that is the case, then what this suggests is that even putatively “authentic” EVP recordings (recordings that don’t resemble “songs, commercials, news” etc) can result from interference of the very kind the chapter’s authors tried to discount. The authors then dismiss the possibility that what they’ve offered is evidence disproving ghostly origin however, by asking readers to believe that “the EVP that follows the click is clearly not a CB, walkie-talkie or ham radio transmission” (emphasis added), without explaining why, and overlooking the possibility that an ordinary CB or walkie-talkie burst may have been misheard as “authentic” EVP (ie – as a ghost) as a result of auditory pareidolia.
“Parapsychology: A Handbook” does acknowledge that “pareidolia is certainly a plausible explanation for some reported EVP” (emphasis added), but claims that pareidolia effects seem “less likely in instances in which the recorded voice stands out by virtue of being notably louder than the background noise”. Although the practice of adding noise to recordings is a feature of EVP research methods which has been shown (by the “Rorschach Audio” publications) to dramatically enhance the mind’s ability to project pareidolia onto sounds, in contrast, as shown by the (extraordinary) demonstration recordings made by the psychoacoustics expert Diana Deutsch, pareidolia still form when listeners hear ambiguous speech sounds against a background of virtually zero noise. The Handbook then states that a “dearth of research has left both EVP enthusiasts and debunkers free to assert their positions unfettered by evidence” (emphasis added), however, as the more than 50 references at the end of the chapter show, there’s plenty of evidence.
In responding to the frankly strong evidence that “Rorschach Audio” type effects are responsible for EVP, the Handbook then states that “the question is whether pareidolia is responsible for all EVP” (the way the “Rorschach Audio” paper expressed this question 14 years earlier, was to ask whether EVP researchers are willing to consider the possibility that “projection effects might be responsible… for all manifestations of EVP”). The authors state that “the answer is that we simply do not know”. They also claim that “some debunkers do not seem to recognise the fallacy of concluding that all purported EVP are due to mundane causes simply because some of them clearly are”. In terms of public understanding of science, this seems to reflect a widespread misconception that anything can be absolutely proven by science. As I understand it, it’s completely consistent with mainstream philosophy-of-science to acknowledge that even the most rigorous science cannot produce absolute certainty about anything. In mainstream science, the best available hypotheses are provisionally accepted, in lieu of absolute facts, until those hypotheses are improved, discarded or replaced (and even if hypotheses do survive experimental testing, they still remain provisional until new evidence or better hypotheses emerge). The fact that science cannot ever, in the strictest sense, absolutely disprove any theoretical possibility, is intrinsic to the nature of theoretical possibilities, hence the term… and this in turn allows for the possibility that any imaginary or fantastical event, no matter how improbable, might one day happen. There is for instance the theoretical possibility that the teapot that the philosopher Bertrand Russell imagined floating around the sun might one day travel through space and materialise on a shelf in your local supermarket.
On a more positive note, and as it happens however, the most revealing and useful evidence that’s presented in “Parapsychology: A Handbook” isn’t so much what this chapter’s authors say about mishearing, as much as what they say about what they seem to have clearly heard, which wasn’t a distorted voice… it was an abrupt mechanical sound – the click… see above.
[1] https://rorschachaudio.com/2011/12/09/rorschach-audio-mit/
[2] http://www.mcfarlandbooks.com/book-2.php?id=978-0-7864-7916-0
[3] http://people.duke.edu/~leary/
[4] http://atransc.org/radiosweep-study2c/
[5] http://atransc.org/about-directors/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rorschach_test
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell’s_teapot
Article copyright © Joe Banks, 26 Nov 2016
From → Uncategorized
Joe Banks defends mainstream science in favour of EVP, then turns out senior academics are involved in EVP!
Yes, however there’s no contradiction. What “Rorschach Audio” promotes is (among other things) improved public understanding of scientific methodology, whereas some “public understanding of science” projects seem to focus more on promoting science as a professional and/or institutional culture (which is something different). So, in practice, it is sometimes possible for individuals to hold positions as “accredited” scientists, but still fall short in some applications of scientific methodology.